Socio-Economic
Rights and Accountability Project, SERAP has asked former Minister of
Finance Ngozi Okonjo Iweala to “apologise to Nigerians for claiming recently
that recovered Abacha loot was transparently spent while she knew that
$322m (about N63billion) recovered Abacha funds were inappropriately
released to finance the fight against Boko Haram.”
SERAP’s
statement today followed Mrs Okonjo-Iweala’s confession that she
released about $322m to the former National Security Adviser Sambo
Dasuki for military operations.
In a
statement signed by SERAP Executive Director Adetokunbo Mumuni, the
organisation said that, “The truth about the spending of Abacha loot is now
coming out, and it is clear that Mrs Okonjo-Iweala was wrong to accuse SERAP of
bias while she knew that we are simply seeking truth, justice and
accountability on the spending of recovered Abacha loot.”
“Mrs
Okonjo-Iweala’s approach of ‘no answers, no apology’ on how Abacha loot was
spent is doing her reputation more harm than good. We hope that she will take
cue from the World Bank (her former employer) when it defined ‘accountability
and probity’ as knowing what task has been set, accepting to do it,
and going about it with a sense of probity. Probity implying the willingness to
self-disclose such information to which a specific stakeholder group has a
right as well as tolerance of the scrutiny of such a stakeholder group
on information to which they have a right,” the organisation said.
“We
therefore urge her to now come out for the sake of millions of Nigerians living
in extreme poverty but also of generations as yet
unborn and tell Nigerians the whole story about what exactly happened to
recovered Abacha loot, as well as publicly apologise for claiming that Abacha
loot was transparently spent. She should be willing to be held to account,” the
organisation added.
The
letter, dated January 20, 2015, which was addressed to former President
Goodluck Jonathan, revealed that $322m of Abacha loot was transferred
following a January 12, 2015 request by the office of the former National
Security Advise Sambo Dasuki for funds for the procurement of arms and
ammunition as well as intelligence equipment. The letter reads: “Please find a
request by the National Security Adviser (NSA) for the transfer of $300 million
and £5.5 million of the recovered Abacha funds to an ONSA [Office of the
National Security Adviser] operations account.
The
NSA has explained that this is to enable the purchase of ammunition, security,
and other intelligence equipment for the security agencies in order to enable
them fully confront the ongoing Boko Haram threat. His request is sequel to the
meeting you chaired with the committee on the use of recovered funds where the
decision was made that recovered Abacha funds would be split 50-50 between
urgent security needs to confront Boko Haram and development need (including a
portion for the Future Generations window of the Sovereign Wealth Fund)”.
It
would be recalled that SERAP had raised some questions for Mrs Okonjo-Iweala to
answer regarding how Abacha loot was spent.
The
questions read in part: “First, the World Bank confirmed that of the 51
projects reviewed, 23 were described as “completed”, 26 were at various stages
of completion, and 2 were described as “abandoned”. Nigerians would like Mrs
Okonjo-Iweala to show us evidence of the 23 projects allegedly completed, and
whether the 26 projects where actually completed; and what became of the 2
abandoned projects.”
“Second,
the World Bank confirmed that 6 out of 8 health centers reviewed pertained to
physical infrastructure but were not completed. Nigerians would like Mrs
Okonjo-Iweala to explain why these projects were not completed on time, and
whether in fact they were completed at all; as well as location of completed
projects.”
“Nigerians
would also like Mrs Okonjo-Iweala to explain the letter she wrote to the
Ambassador of Switzerland to Nigeria January 9, 2005 that of the 174 health
centers built with Abacha funds, 138 were fully functional and that remaining
36 were expected to be commissioned in January 2005. Nigerians would appreciate
it if Mrs Okonjo-Iweala could identify and name all the health centers
mentioned her letter.”
“Third,
as regards power projects, the World Bank confirmed that payments by government
to contractors could not be verified “because in most cases contact information
for contractors was not available,” and that 10 of the 18 power projects
pertained to physical electrical installations.
Nigerians
would like Mrs Okonjo-Iweala to identify and name the 10 installations, and to
provide contact details of the contractors that executed the projects.”
“Fourth,
the World Bank confirmed that most of the recovered funds were used to repay
domestic borrowing. Nigerians would like Mrs Okonjo-Iweala to explain how much
exactly was involved as a part of 2004 annual budget execution in anticipation
of the repatriation of the looted funds in 2004, as well as repayment terms of
the funds and from which banks.”
“Fifth,
the World Bank confirmed that the government opened a special US dollar account
for recovered funds with the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, to
which various transfers of Abacha loot were made. The World Bank also confirmed
that some $50 mn was received before 2005 which was kept in the special
account. Nigerians would like Mrs Okonjo-Iweala to explain how much was left in
the account by the time she left office in May.”
“Sixth,
the World Bank confirmed that the data on inflows of recovered funds are
broadly identical but that there was one material discrepancy, which was
unexplained. The Bank also said the information it received from the government
‘does not contain a reference to the transfer of $5.2 mn in August of 2006.’
Nigerians would like Mrs Okonjo-Iweala to explain the material discrepancy, and
why the transfer of $5.2 mn was not disclosed to the Bank.”
“Seventh,
the World Bank confirmed that Abacha returned loot was used as source of 2005 budget
deficit financing, and that the funds were directed to co-financing of capital
expenditure and balancing the 2005 budget. Nigerians would like Mrs
Okonjo-Iweala to explain exactly the capital expenditure involved.”
“Eighth,
the World Bank confirmed that the Abacha funds were used to provide additional
financing for the Universal Basic Education (UBE) program in the amount of
NGN24.25 bn to support basic education throughout the country. This amount was
fully disbursed and fully utilized. Nigerians would like Mrs Okonjo-Iweala to
identify the number and location of schools which benefited from these funds at
the time.”
“Ninth,
the World Bank confirmed that there were problems with collecting
project-related information because of under-developed reporting and accounting
standards, and absence of properly set-up databases for sectoral project
portfolios; and weak administrative capacity in the ministry of finance.
Nigerians would like Mrs Okonjo-Iweala to explain why this was the case under
her watch.”
“Tenth,
the World Bank confirmed that 13 road projects were completed including 3 of
the largest road and bridge projects in each geo-political zone. Also, the Bank
regretted that it was not possible to interview many contractors in order to
obtain independent confirmation of amounts spent on individual projects, and
record their comments on project status. Nigerians would like Mrs Okonjo-Iweala
to explain exactly happened, and to identify unconfirmed individual projects,
including the largest roads and bridges completed.”
“Eleventh,
the World Bank confirmed that no special arrangements were made for project
selection and monitoring. According to the Bank, ‘Given the weakness of general
budget reporting systems at the moment, this decision greatly undermined the
opportunity for tracking the returned Abacha funds and analysis of their
utilization.’ Nigerians would like Mrs Okonjo-Iweala to explain why this was
the case under her watch.”
Culled
from the Vanguard!!
0 Comments
DISCLAIMER
The views and opinions expressed on this platform as comments were freely made by each person under his or her own volition or responsibility and were neither suggested nor dictated by the owners of Precious Eze's Blog or any of their contracted staff. So we take no liability whatsoever for such comments.
Please take note!