 |
| MTN & NCC. |
The Federal High Court in Abuja, on Friday, declined to
compel MTN Nigeria Communications Limited to pay into the federation account
the total sum of N1.40trillion, being the fine that was imposed on it by the
Nigerian Communications Commission, NCC.
The court equally refused to issue an order of mandamus to compel NCC to perform its statutory obligation under section 45(1) (a) (b) and (c) of the Nigeria Communications Act, by revoking MTN’s operation license, pending when it pays the fine.
In a judgment that was delivered by Justice Babatunde
Quadri, the court dismissed the suit which queried powers of the
Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami,
SAN, and the Minister of Communications Technology, Adebayo Shittu to reduce
the fine imposed on MTN to N780billion
The suit was filed before the court by a member of the House of Representatives, Hon. Raphael Igbokwe and Mr. Emmanuel Njoku, who told the court that they acted on behalf of ‘Nigerians Against Exploitation By Telecommunications Operators’.
The suit was filed before the court by a member of the House of Representatives, Hon. Raphael Igbokwe and Mr. Emmanuel Njoku, who told the court that they acted on behalf of ‘Nigerians Against Exploitation By Telecommunications Operators’.
Cited as defendants were the NCC, MTN Nigeria
Communications Ltd, the AGF and the Minister of Communication Technology.
Specifically, the plaintiffs through their lawyer, Mr. Okere Kingdom, prayed
the court to among other things, determine “Whether or not the Hon. Minister of
Justice/Attorney General of the Federation and the Minister of Communications
Technology have powers to amend, alter, adjust or vary any provisions of a
delegated legislation or any other law validly made by the National Assembly,
or any rules, regulations and orders validly made by any delegated legislature
pursuant to an Act of the National Assembly.
“Whether or not the National Assembly of Nigeria or any Arm
of the National Assembly has the constitutional powers to constitute an
investigative panel and to summon any government official, to inquire into the
circumstances surrounding the alteration, variation and reduction of the fine
lawfully imposed on MTN Nigeria Communications Ltd by NCC, which fine was
imposed pursuant to delegated powers conferred on the NCC by an Act of the
National Assembly. “Whether or not MTN Nigeria Communications Ltd has breached
section 146(1) and (2) of the NCC Act and sections 19(1) and 20 (1) and (2) of
the NCC (Registration of Telephone Subscribers Regulations) 2011, by
intentionally and wilfully failing to disconnect and register all unregistered
subscribers on its network as stipulated in the Act”.
The 1st plaintiff, Hon. Igbokwe, in 12-paragraphed
affidavit he deposed to in support of the suit, told the court that the House
of Reps had by a motion moved by Hon. Ehiozuwa Johnson captioned ‘need to
investigate the payment made by MTN on the fine levied by the NCC’, constituted
a committee to investigate issues, circumstances and motives behind “the huge
reduction of the N1.40trillion fine imposed on MTN. He maintained that
controversies surrounding the reduction of the fine was a matter of public
interest for which Nigerians deserved to know, adding that both Malami and
Shittu refused to appear before the House of Reps investigative committee,
“thereby denying Nigerians opportunity to know the said circumstances and
rationale leading to the reduction of the fine”. Meanwhile, all the defendants
challenged the competence of the suit, contending that the plaintiffs lacked
the locus standi to institute the action. The NCC, through its lawyer, Chief
Wole Olanipekun, SAN, urged the court to dismiss the suit on the ground that
the plaintiffs’ reliefs did not disclose any personal or proprietary rights vested
in them that was violated by the defendants.
All the defendants argued that the suit was statute barred,
noting that 30 days had elapsed before the plaintiffs approached the court to
challenge the fine they said was reduced since 2015.
In his judgment, Justice Quadri upheld preliminary
objections the defendants filed against the suit. The court held that the
plaintiffs did not fulfill necessary condition precedents before the suit was
filed. It held that they failed to exhaust all other remedies that were
provided in sections 86, 87 and 88 of the NCC Act and Order 34 of the Federal
High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules.
According to the judge, the plaintiffs ought to have
applied for statement of reason from the NCC, request for a review of the
decision of the commission within 30 days, and specify reasons why they wanted
MTN to be compelled to pay the fine in full. Justice Quadri said it was only
after the conditions are fulfilled that the plaintiffs could apply to court for
a judicial review of the decision.
Consequently, he dismissed the suit.
Culled from Vanguard.
0 Comments
DISCLAIMER
The views and opinions expressed on this platform as comments were freely made by each person under his or her own volition or responsibility and were neither suggested nor dictated by the owners of Precious Eze's Blog or any of their contracted staff. So we take no liability whatsoever for such comments.
Please take note!