News Update


Header Ads Widget

NIGERIAN AGRICULTURE: We May Start Exporting Nigerian Fertilizer Within The Next Two-Years ---- Thomas Etuh.

Mr. Thomas Etuh (up).

The Chairman of Fertilizer Producers and Suppliers Association of Nigeria (FEPSAN) Mr. Thomas Etuh has come out to say that Nigeria will be in a good position to export fertilizer within the next two years if current gains of the Presidential Fertilizer Initiative (PFI) are sustained.

Already, Etuh says, the country is currently selling the important agro input to some of Nigeria’s neighbours like Benin Republic, Chad, Cameroon and Niger Republic, a development according to him, will help restore the country’s position as the food basket of the West African sub-region, as the export opportunity from fertilizer, he revealed, will be made possible by the increased local production of fertilizer that has ramped up from a mere 500,000 metric tonnes pre-2015 to close to 2 million metric tonnes currently.

Mr. Etuh, who made this known in a statement in Abuja on Monday, commended the President, Muhammadu Buhari for initiating the Presidential Fertilizer Initiative, which he said, has helped farmers access the critical agricultural input at affordable prices thereby reducing their overheads, boosting yield and encouraging more players to invest in the agriculture value chain.

“Before the conceptualization and activation of the PFI, we had a situation where there were 32 fertilizer blending plants in Nigeria that were moribund. Out of this number, only five blending plants were functional and even then, they were producing at 10 percent capacity on the average and that was because of excessive emphases on importation. This also meant, by its very implication, that we were exporting our jobs even when we cannot provide jobs here in Nigeria., even as the Foreign Exchange that is scarce is spent building other people’s economies,” he stated.

Furthermore, he said that Nigerians must make concerted efforts to show commitment towards solving the employment challenges that has been mounting in the country over the past decades and was sure that one of the critical planks of reversing the trend was a sustained investment in agriculture in such as creative way as not to create losses on both the government and the people and commended the President for showing what he called the “political will” that has made it possible for the initiative to become a huge success, expressing his optimism that the journey towards food security for Nigeria may well have begun on a sound footing with the huge impact the PFI programme has made on the volume of food production in Nigeria within only two years.

“We were lucky that we have a president that has the interest and political will to make a difference and he was ready to make this initiative to work from get-go. And those of us in the fertilizer blending industry had no option but to key in to this willingness. We were made to understand that beyond the profits necessary for our businesses, it was important for us to see the project as critical to nation building. We were made to appreciate the roles we had to play, first as citizens and then as businesses,” he continued.

On how to measure the results of the scheme, Mr Etuh said the evidence is easily noticeable in the increasing volume of production of staples like rice and maize by farmers in the country, crediting it to the increased appetite for the purchase of fertilizers.

According to him, “Nigerians can testify; farmers can also testify that it has been a great initiative from Mr. President. The revolutions that happened in rice production, the revolutions that happened in maize production are both good examples. It will interest you to note that in 2017, because of the Presidential Fertilizer Initiative, Nigerians consumption stood at 1,570,000 metric tonnes of fertilizer. This was the first time in the history of this country from independence.

Concluding he said, Can you imagine what would have been the situation had the country been importing fertilizers? And this happened without the government providing any form of subsidy.”

Post a Comment