Rochas & Eze Madumere. |
A
former Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice in Imo State, Professor
Francis Dike (SAN), spoke with GIBSON ACHONU of the Punch Newspapers on
the recent removal of the state Deputy Governor, Eze Madumere.
As a
Senior Advocate of Nigeria, a former chairman of the Nigeria Bar Association,
Owerri chapter, who also served under Governor Rochas Okorocha as Justice
commissioner, what is your take on the removal of the state Deputy Governor,
Eze Madumere?
It
is glaring to everybody that members of the state House of Assembly, who
carried out the impeachment of the deputy governor are pretenders. Taking
cognizance of a popular saying, that “One cannot see himself except with the
aid of a mirror,” members of the House of Assembly should be reminded that the
people of the state saw them and that what we saw in them was disappointing.
However, Madumere has always been loyal to the governor for a period spanning
many decades and there have not been any dispute whatsoever between them. One
may therefore ask, What informed his removal? Ironically, there were persons,
in concert with the state legislators that came up with trumped-up charges
against the deputy governor, thereby calling for his removal. The problem
between the governor and his deputy is that Okorocha wants his son-in-law to
leap-frog into the governorship position. The truth is that Madumere does not
quarrel about that, he is only demanding that the people should decide who, is
the fit and proper person to be in that position. If the governor feels that
his son-in-law is qualified, then let the contest start, but instead of
allowing this, the governor hired the state spineless legislators to remove his
deputy.
Were
the offences levelled against him worth his removal?
The issue of dereliction of duty for
instance, was a classical case of the legislature trying to control the
Executive. It is like the lawmakers querying the judgement of a judge. The
legislature cannot do that because it is a different arm of government and can
therefore, not question the judge. For an offence to qualify as impeachable, it
ought to be within the public domain. A tale by an aggrieved person or some
aggrieved persons ought not to be regarded as an impeachable offence.
Was the removal of Madumere proper since a court had
given an injunction before the exercise was carried out?
The question of carrying out the
impeachment proceedings when there was a court injunction was an act of
legislative rascality. The judicial system stands out at the apex of any
civilized society. Even every autocracy still maintains the judiciary after
kicking out the legislature and executive arms of government. Having said this,
the impeachment in the face of the court injunction was ultra vires and of no
consequence. It must be realised that judicial power in Nigeria under the
constitution lies with the law courts. What the legislature, even the Chief
Judge and members of the seven-man panel constituted was an inferior tribunal,
not by any stretch of imagination, equivalent to a court. Hence, the Chief
Judge cannot and I mean cannot, go against an order of court as he may face the
consequences of being cited for contempt. This is the position we are now. Even
the Chief Judge of the Federation has no power to swear-in the Deputy
Governor-designate, Callistus Ekenze.
Is
the judiciary not interfering in legislative and executive process by stopping
the swearing-in of Ekenze as the new deputy governor?
I would describe the scenario as one of
those consequences of people winning Pyrrhic victory, which turns out like
ashes melting in the mouth. Having stubbornly and stupidly gone on with the
process of impeachment, they must have beaten their chests claiming victory,
which of course on Tuesday, July 31, 2018 (the day of the swearing-in) became
pyrrhic.
What is your take on Okorocha’s decision to make sure
that his son-in-law succeeds him despite his declaration that the era of
god-fatherism was gone in the state?
We all have our tattoos given by nature
for good or bad. Certain persons have the misfortune of not being introspective
more so, when without the discipline of education, it becomes obvious, a
contradiction in life. They make statements off-the-cuff and which are, many a
time, contradictory. If what we are seeing in Imo is not godfatherism, then we
stand to ask what godfatherism is all about. The governor is the father-in-law
to his favoured candidate, whom we see his pictures on billboards, all over the
state. At this point, I want to disclose that we in Orlu zone of the state have
unanimously said that we are not going to support an Orlu person for
governorship. This presupposes that Owerri or Okigwe zone should produce the
next governor.
This stand has made an impact as can be evidenced by the paucity
of candidates from Orlu for the seat.
Culled from the Punch Newspapers.
0 Comments
DISCLAIMER
The views and opinions expressed on this platform as comments were freely made by each person under his or her own volition or responsibility and were neither suggested nor dictated by the owners of Precious Eze's Blog or any of their contracted staff. So we take no liability whatsoever for such comments.
Please take note!