Hon. Muhammed Bago. |
Following
yesterday’s (Tuesday, April 16, 2019) purported zoning and micro-zoning of the
office of Speaker of the incoming 9th House of Representatives by the National
Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Adams Oshiomhole, there has
been varied reactions by a cross-section of Nigerians, including members-elect,
party stalwarts, political commentators and journalist’s.
For
us in the Hon. Mohammed Umaru Bago Campaign Organization, we view the
development as a poorly choreographed political orchestra aimed at using the
hallowed precincts of the Presidential Villa to anoint a candidate from the
South west geo-political zone.
But,
as attested by some members-elect who attended the late night dinner, and
collaborated by newspaper reports of the event, President Muhammadu Buhari was
smart enough to see through the charade, leading to his open reprimand of the
APC National Chairman for discussing unnecessary details that were unknown to
him, saying that his understanding of how to proceed was that all zones would
meet and discuss zoning.
“I
do not expect you to come into the open and say this much, Mr. Chairman’’,
President Buhari reportedly said after Oshiomhole pronounced Hon. Femi
Gbajamiamila as the anointed candidate of the party.
For
us, therefore, there is no retreat, no surrender, in our demand for equity and
justice in the zoning arrangement, and the ultimate desire of many
members-elect to be allowed to choose their own leaders.
Indeed,
our quest for inclusivity has rather than been stifled only gained further
traction, especially against the realization that the template which our
National Chairman relied upon in arriving at this curious choice remains hazy.
Consequently,
a flurry of posers are immediately thrown up, to wit: In arriving at this
divisive decision, was the National caucus of the APC consisting of President
Buhari, his deputy, Professor Yemi Osibanjo, National Leader, Asiwaju Bola
Tinubu, APC Governors, Board of Trustees (BOT) members and party stalwarts,
including contenders for the office of Speaker and other leading members of the
legislature from the party carried along?
If
this question is answered in the affirmative, it would, therefore, be
interesting to let Nigerians know on what date such a parley took place, who
moved the motion for zoning and micro-zoning, who seconded it, and who voted
for and against such proposal?
As
a matter of fact, what better indication of lack of amity among National
Working Committee (NWC) members of the party in arriving at this torrid
decision, than the position of the Deputy National Publicity of the APC, Hon.
Yekini Nabena on the day the contrived decision was announced.
Nabena,
a member of the NWC had clearly ruled out the North west and the South west in
the sharing of elective offices in both Senate and House of Representatives.
Addressing
journalists in Abuja, Nabena said: ‘’The Deputy Senate President should be
zoned to the South south while the Speaker and Deputy Speaker of the House of
Representatives should be zoned to the North central and South east in any
order agreed by the party’s leadership.
‘’The
South west already has a slot filled by the Vice President. In any case, the
South west does not necessarily translate to Lagos or Ogun state. This is
sentiment widely shared by our members from the zone’’, Nabena said.
Warning
that our “actions and inactions will have serious implications on party
unity’’, the APC deputy national publicity secretary urged the party to adhere
to the principle of federal character which is a constitutional requirement, in
determining the leadership of the national assembly.
Flowing
from the above, it is our contention that our party is being goaded towards the
same ignoble path which led to the 2015 fiasco, which the National Assembly
leadership tussle turned out to be. Lawmakers cannot be coerced into being
lawbreakers, as the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999, as
amended, states in section 14 (3) that “The composition of the Government of
the Federation or any of its agencies and the conduct of its affairs shall be carried
out in such a manner as to reflect the Federal Character of Nigeria and the
need to promote national unity, and also to command national loyalty, thereby
ensuring that there shall be no predominance of persons from a few state or
from a few ethnic or sectional groups in that Government or any of its
agencies”.
We,
therefore, condemn this obvious attempt to drag our party through the same
tortuous path of 2015, all in a bid to sustain a legacy of imposition aimed at
entrenching one man’s imperious dynasty.
Until
- and unless - the right thing is done, we reiterate our commitment to the
pursuit of equity, justice and the independence of the legislature.
0 Comments
DISCLAIMER
The views and opinions expressed on this platform as comments were freely made by each person under his or her own volition or responsibility and were neither suggested nor dictated by the owners of Precious Eze's Blog or any of their contracted staff. So we take no liability whatsoever for such comments.
Please take note!